Levitikus 23

Babcock, Bryan C., Sacred Time in West Semitic Festival Calendars and the Dating of Leviticus 23: Journal for the Evangelical Study of the Old Testament 2, 2013, 1–23.

Babcock, Bryan C., Sacred Ritual. A Study of the West Semitic Ritual Calendars in Leviticus 23 and the Akkadian Text Emar 446 (Bulletin for Biblical Research: Supplements 9), Winona Lake, IN 2014.

Kilchör, Benjamin, Passah und Mazzot – Ein Überblick über die Forschung seit dem 19. Jahrhundert: Biblica 94, 2013, 340–367.

Abstract »

Published abstract: With the beginning of the historical-critical study of the Old Testament, the biblical picture of the origin and development of Passover and Mazzot was not taken for granted anymore. Since there are a lot of texts concerning this topic, however, the options to explain the history of Passover and Mazzot are legion. Starting with George and Wellhausen, this article attempts to outline the history of research on Passover and Mazzot up to now. Some thoughts on the current state of research complete the paper.

Körting, Corinna, „Seid fröhlich vor dem Herrn, eurem Gott“. Ein Beitrag zu Geschichte und Bedeutung des Festkalenders in Lev 23: BiKi 69, 2014, 96–101.

Abstract »

Published abstract: Leviticus 23 is the basis for most of the Jewish holidays celebrated today. The chapter is the longest holiday calendar of the Old Testament. The names and dates for the feasts are basically used until today. On p. 97, C. Körting presents an illustration of the cycle of the Jewish year with months and festival days. She explains all the festivals of Leviticus 23 separately. Purim and Chanukah are mentioned briefly by referring to other biblical passages. Körting concludes that participating in the celebration of the holydays includes the congregation into the life-giving order of creation: The festivals are designed as the affirmation of the community between humans (Israel) and God.

Langgut, D.; Gadot, Y.; Lipschits, Oded, “Fruit of Goodly Trees.” The Beginning of Citron Cultivation in Israel and its Penetration into Jewish Tradition and Culture: Beit Mikra 59, 2014, 38–55.

Abstract »

Abstract from OTA 38, 2015, 671, #2217: The authors point out that even though the Etrog (citron) is traditionally used on the holiday of Sukkot as one of the four prescribed species, it is not explicitly mentioned in this connection in the Bible. Rather, the intended species is referred to, indistinctly, as the “fruit of goodly trees” (Lev 23:40). The authors argue that the Etrog is not mentioned because it reached the region in the 5th-4th centuries under the Persians.—D.E.G.

Moskovitz, Gabriel, The Genesis of the etrog (Citron) as Part of the Four Species: Jewish Bible Quarterly 43, 2015, 109–115.

Abstract »

Abstract from OTA 38, 2015, 671, #2218: Jews the world over celebrate the festival of Sukkot, in September or early October. One of the unique rituals of this holiday is taking the ʾarbaʿ mînîm (four species), which are defined as the lûlāv (palm branch), ʾetrôg (citron fruit), hădassîm (myrtle branches), and ʿarāvôt (willow branches), reciting a blessing over them, and then waving them in six directions. However, Lev 23:40 does not specifically identify the citron fruit (Citrus Medica), as one of the four species used in the ritual. The Bible calls instead for pĕrî ʿēṣ hādār (“the fruit of goodly trees”). When referring to the Feast of Tabernacles, the Bible enjoins: “Ye shall take you on the first day the fruit of goodly trees, branches of palm-trees, and boughs of thick trees, and willows of the brook, and ye shall rejoice before the Lord your God seven days” (Lev 23:40). Nehemiah 8 uses similar wording to describe a ritual event that occurred during the Second Temple period. Sometime during the period beginning with Ezra, Israel made a transition from the Prophet/Temple Priest arbiter of Jewish law to a proto-rabbinic exegetical model. This new era had a formative role in creating the vast body of rabbinical definition, exposition, and innovation vis-à-vis Torah. It gave birth inter alia to the novel idea and tradition of identifying the newly discovered ʾetrōg (citron from India), with its unique aroma and beauty, as one of the “goodly fruit/trees” referred to in Leviticus 23.—F.W.G.

Pakkala, Juha, God’s Word Omitted. Omissions in the Transmission of the Hebrew Bible (Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments 251), Göttingen 2013.

Abstract »

Auf S. 134–154 befasst sich J. Pakkala mit dem literarischen Abhängigkeitsverhältnis des Heiligkeitsgesetzes vom Deuteronomium und argumentiert hauptsächlich auf der Basis von Beobachtungen am Festkalender Lev 23 dafür, dass H das dtn Gesetz ersetzen wollte. Besonders behandelt werden das Wochenfest und das Laubhüttenfest. Für die Entwicklung des Pessachfestes macht J. Pakkala einen eindrucksvollen Vorschlag. Die älteste Fassung sei Ex 23,15–18, die von Dtn 16,1–8 rezipiert wird, während Lev 23,5–8 die jüngste Fassung der drei Versionen darstelle und ein eigenständiger, neuer Entwurf auf der Basis der älteren Texte sei. Die späteste Entwicklungsstufe sei Num 28,16–25, die eng mit der Levitikus-Fassung zusammenhänge. Eine weitere außerbiblische Entwicklungsstufe finde sich in der Tempelrolle (11QT 17,6–16). Auf S. 153 bringt J. Pakkala folgendes Stemma:


HThKAT – fortgeführt …